28 Program wins **16 Patents**58 Patent Applications

XTouch Metal Mesh Touch Sensors and Diamond Guard Hard Coat Resin (Glass Replacement Technology)

Free
Message: This seems real informative to me, although i know not of options trading

If this holds true, this stk won't be going anywhere for awhile. Comments please.

In response to msg 12990 by berkstump2 view thread

Now, let's watch the September Call OI for how Unxl PPS will behave

Let's start out bey recording (from Yahoo data), the Sept Calls:
Call Options Expire at close Saturday, September 20, 2014
StrikeSymbolLastChgBidAskVolOpen Int
6.00 UNXL140920C00006000 1.70 0.00 1.30 2.00 8 13
7.00 UNXL140920C00007000 1.10 0.20 0.90 1.15 494 15
8.00 UNXL140920C00008000 0.50 0.17 0.40 0.60 414 87
9.00 UNXL140920C00009000 0.30 0.12 0.10 0.45 1,711 63
10.00 UNXL140920C00010000 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.25 46 130
Pay particular attention to Friday's activity in the Sept $9.00 Call, 1,711 contracts were traded.
the effect on the OI will finally show up on Monday, however it would not surprise me to see the OI increase by some
100 to 1700 contacts.
With a projected dirty of Unxl technical advances expected in October, it may very well be that the majority of this
increased OI is represented by contracts that were STO (sold to open).
Think about it:
The PPS closes at $7.62 this past Friday. What happens if the PPS closes at $9.05 on Friday , 9/19?
The PPS would have risen $1.42 in one month ( +18.6 %) and if the $0.30 received after STO'ing the $9 Call is taken into account, that amount goes from $1.42 to $1.72 in total .
$1.72 of profit would be 22.57% on an a projected purchase price of $7.62. That's 22.57% in one month.
With a sub-$9 PPS close on 9/19 , that covered Call position yields $0.30, which would represent a 3.9% one month
'dividend.'
Think that that wouldn't be much?
There are Funds out there that would consider 3.9% in Three Months to be decent rate of return !
So, anyone want to mark this post as a means to test just how wacko ol' Berk truly is?
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply