Looks like about the same amount of co operation as between NOT and FWR. ..And how about the lack of disclosure on the Poundmaker work program. Then again I am reminded of the derogatory call I received from Sean, not to promote SKP but to slam WEL. Is there a motive / objective here?

If SKP management truly wanted as many holes drilled in the belt as they say, then there would be more co operation to support all the players in the belt.

I still think SKP will make a move of WEL... even though they deny it adamantly... just a little too adamantly! Heck they are allready implying the fold axis as being on their golden fairway.

Hi RES. In reference to the above: You really think SKP is going to make a run at WEL? I want to hear what Sean said. PM me if you wish. My take is that WEL made a great deal with SKP. SKP will deliver. We are in the early stages of the JV and this kind of stuff takes time. Yes they are late with an update on the pounmaker but that does not mean we are enemy's with them. My take is SKP need's to raise cash. Why the heck would they promote the poundmaker and make WEL look more attractive when they are trying to raise funds for themselves. Promoting the poundmaker would simply make WEL look like a better deal and steer away potential investor interest in SKP. They will need to deliver when they start spending money. Next year.