i have been asked to submit a draft of  a letter to the tsx which would be representative for shareholders on this discucussion group

your input is welcome and necessary.  i will not be responding due to time commitments but will review and make adjustments, should you,as a group like until it isgenerally agreed upon. time is of the essence

constructive ideas and critisism only please. this is important to us. i will be posting this on sh and inviting comments as well

At 7:31 PM -0800 12/2/07, P Bawdy wrote:
>To TSX
>   Officer charged with Winfield Resouces
>
>   We are a group of WWF shareholders seeking some information
>regarding the trading status of our company. Shareholders in our
>group control approximatly 20% or 10 million shares.


>   It is uor understading that you represent the the citizens of BC
>and act in the best interest of all in this matter.


   The last time my boss asked me a question a response of "none of
your business' would have been viewed as being both inappropriate and
provocative. It would constitute insubordination and grounds for
immediate dismissal.

>   The TSX halted trading in shares of the company pending
>investigation for 'change of busness'. A list of 18 questions was
>posed and, as we understand it, answered to te saisfaction of
>officials of MRS. That was it. There has been no other news or
>explanation provided, and even this much is the subject of
>conjecture given the absence of clear information. We expcted
>immediate  reinstatement. When this  didn't happen, various
>shareholders called for an explanation.......What we as shareholders
>in the company got was: "none of your business".
>
   Well ...wakey wakey Mr listing officer.

This *is* most certainly our business. We own the company, and you,
as a public servant, must address our needs as concerned and involved
parties.

   There has been no word on the resumption of trading, and now, the
'Badshah factor" has surfaced, with a hearing scheduled for Dec11:
one day after we expect to sign an agreement that will force a
further halt due to an actual change of business. The word
'convenient' comes immediately to mind.

>   The TSX has been aware of this for some time. We find it
>suspiscious that the exchange chooses to spring this tidbit now.
>Could it be that a reinstatement was never planned??


From my chair, it certainly looks that way. Political pressures from
outside influences???? Once again....most likely.. Could you clarify
in the interests of all?

Rumours abound regarding the poor handling of WWF by provicial
regulators. A statement from your office is long overdue.

>   Openly we ask why have we been singled out for such treatment.
>Other listings in similar circumstancesare not treated thus. Why the
>complete lack of disclosure? Itl leads one to beleive something is
>afoot, or some secret deal has been made.  It also begs questions
>related to the integrity of the exchange and the application of
>political interference.

Our patience is long past being exhausted. On behalf of this group of
shareholders immediate clarification is required.

XXXXXXX

>   spokesperson
>   VICTORIA BC
>  
>   \
>
>      
>---------------------------------