In my original rant [lol post] The ? of taxing the auditors bill was posed to you the shareholders. Not one respondent either publically or privately.

Realistically , this forum and its members, watchers and casual lookie loos represent modestly , a minimum of 30 million shares, and quite possibly closer to 50. in other words..control. There are about 58 million issued before this pp of 3 million

From the family fueds we have here from time to time, (dysfunctional?)I know we are not without fotitude and backbone when it comes to our convictions, heck , 'barracuda babs' grows a tough fin that protrudes!!!!

To tax a bill from a professional, such as a lawyer or accountant is simple and can be done from a live internet connection in most cases. It would cost little and possibly net wwf up to 50%, with little at risk to us. This is a speculative number of course,,,but a nudge might have the auditor think twice before thier excessive demands

Is there one among us besides myself that feels the same. A majority would give our president a push to do this, (or appoint someone...like me)before listing arrangements and the business of the company swallow up his available time.

Speak up you back benchers and fellow hub leaders...Ian?

royrogers