I think your numbers are a little more than conservatively low. Resource was already pegged at minimal $8500 per ton and you're using $7500. Not sure where you got the 2500 per ton cost but I haven't heard that number either. If you in fact did write the blog, the numbers you used in the blog are quite different (higher) than the numbers I'm seeing you use here which leads me to believe your about the same as the rest of us: "we can guess but we just won't know until the PEA comes out"...

I agree with you Rennie69.

Eric Muschinski, the author of this newsletter seems to be overly conservative. I will email him as I believe he has made an error with the $8500 vs. $7500 and his other #'s