It's interesting how some misrepresent the English language. Read the below again and how the author slips in the word "trouble" for what is likely just "tweaking" and meeting the requirements of someone who is going to be spending a lot for this company or it's product and they want exactly what they want. Like having your suit jacket fitted for a perfect fit after the initial measurements have been made.

Some authors here keep harping on the same thing after having been told to check with HQ while they tell us they can get their info. over coffee with the brass. Question: Why are you here then? Their concern over wanting this worrysome information before they commit is none of our concern and they best stick with CCB if they want the perfect company.

It's one thing to pose scenarios and prompts to keep your head up but I think we've covered that by now.

Also note the use of "customers aren't satisfied". Quite a negative rendering. How about the customers are ecstatic and if you can do this for us "we'll be willing to put more on the table." Neat eh how you can spin it?

I must say, with double digit NDAs, research sponorship, hobnobbing with Tesla, etc., This is a really risky company to be in. :)

Money wrote:"ZEN has a 43-101 resource but is having trouble with the metallurgy"

How do you know this?

How do I know this/

1. The company has stated it publically in their dec press release.

"Further purification test work is underway to produce a potential range of purities that are required by end-users"

They are not there yet. The end users are not yet satisfied.

2. The LONG delay in the PEA . They stated that RPA is waiting on the metallurgy results from SGS.

"The PEA economic evaluation is substantially complete except for the final inputs from the purification test work"

This clearly says that "except for the final inputs from the purification test work" the metallurgical tests are not satisfactory yet so they can't fianalize the PEA.