Seems like you have changed the content of your post entirely.

I disagree with this characterizaion. Here are the relevant quotes from the two posts.

Initial Post - Not from Aubrey - but it would appear that there is internal dissent over the lack of PR support for the stock price. I presented a comparison of how CCB had handled this versus ZEN.

Follow Up - In discussing the relative geological value of the Albany deposit CCB came into the conversation and I pointed out how CCB had handled their good news announcements from a PR standpoint and the impact this had on their stock price versus ZEN's less than ideal approach to this aspect. This is what prompted the comment that there was a difference of opinion in the handling of this.

IMO, the first post is an excellent synopsis of the details presented in the follow up.

it would appear that there is internal dissent VS

there was a difference of opinion

What's the difference? - pretty much the same thing. I give the Goat two thumbs up for consistency.