Emerging Graphene Technology Company
Hydrothermal Graphite Deposit Ammenable for Commercial Graphene Applications
Message: ZEN doing it right
Your Vote:
Did you know?
You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)
Anyone still confused about the debate on purity assays as raised by Chief and supported by Hoov may want to read this link:
Here are some sections of it:
A comparison of elemental analysis results for carbon electrodes, obtained by means of ICP-AES and XRF, is shown in Table 1. ICP-AES has been the method of choice for elemental analysis due to its accuracy.
ICP-AES has the best recovery of elements as compared to ash content (assuming that ash is comprised of elemental oxides). XRF has comparable recoveries. GD-MS and SS-MS techniques give poor results for this level of impurities in graphite.
So the kicker here is that GD-MS is seen as inferior.
ZEN doing it right all along. Anyone here shocked at that?
Choo Choo
Glorieux
19 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply