Re: AACR 2018
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 28, 2018 05:41PM
Zenith's BET Inhibitor ZEN-3694 is Currently Being Evaluated in Multiple Oncology Clinical Trials
The ABBVie ABBV-744 trial re mCRPC and the fact that it is BD-2 selective is interesting to say the least.
So doing a very superficial review of ABBVie using Wikipedia briefly I see;
This is a large and very profitable company with years of depth.
ABBVie has developed ABBV-744 which is a BD-2 of BRD4 selective BET inhibitor (???similar BETi to apabetalone???).
Obviously this company’s trial will not be encumbered by a lack of funds and they will be able to move full steam ahead on this or any other trial. Perhaps they will initiate MACE trials? They may even have significant FDA clout?
So I wonder if this was one of the companies that talked to Don/RVX and decided to develop their own selective BD2 of BRD4 compound?
The mCRPC cancer field seems active with Gilead’s GS-5829, Incyte, ABBVie and Zenith. The 3 big boys will have the money to move forward without interruption. It is difficult to understand if this will fuel interest in zen3694 in terms of Don raising the $10 million (pre the IPO) to keep the zen3694 trial moving? Might Eastern jump in with $10,000,000 to keep things moving? After all, it is a drop in the bucket for Ken Dart, but he did shut down his own division in California.
Unless we see some breakthrough research results on zen3694 is an IPO viable?
From what I have seen the zen3694 trial is showing some positive but mixed results. My guess is that scientists are trying to determine the patient profile that is optimal for when it works and when it does not. If there is a solution to that issue then there may be a clear path forward zen3694.
I was reading about the Apotex (generic drugs) strategy and the key to their success was “first to market”. Seems to me that the big boys in mCRPC have a big advantage on that dimension.
Both Zenith and RVX seem to have so much on the go in terms of IP but without the financial backing they are not moving forward at the speed required. It is a shame. It seems like perhaps the RVX research with post hocs etc may have created enough interest for the big boys to pay attention. Perhaps this spirred ABBVie to develop their own BETi and if others judge this to be promising others will follow. I had been under the impression that it would be quie difficult to develop an apabetalone type compound but perhaps I was wrong? There are probably many compex versions.
Perhaps with the failure of approaches like CETP inhibitors in MACE the big guns are now focusing on selective BETi and the RVX approach (apologies, I know this is Zenith) and putting all of their scientific heavy weights on creating/copying what appear to be promising compounds?
Either way, as of today, it appears that Don is having serious problems in raising money for both companies. Tomorrow is a new day and Don always has come up with positive surprises with the exception of Medison in Israel but there might even be a positive twist here.
GLTA
Toinv