OK gang, help me out here.  The NR says "Favorable alteration, locally displaying disseminations of fine free gold, was observed over this entire interval".  

Is it a stretch to say "visible gold?"  If it's not visible gold then how do they know it's fine free gold over 1,500 feet without assay results?

 Anyway, I've been following along with SUL for a couple of years now.  Even talked to Art Troup and Marc Lee at one of the hard asset conferences.  IMO this is a true sleeper.  This deep hole at Kena has been pushed by Linda Dandy for several years now, but all the recent finances have been used for the Tungsten/Molybdenum drilling at Jersey.  Jersey is the quick route to revenues and Kena would take much longer to develop a mine, even though the gold is there. 

Anyone else have an opinion on this first deep drill at Kena?

 griz