last count of infringing co's were hundreds over 300 for ptsc.

edig vs. ptsc is IMO different in these respect;

-edig has their tech. in use in the past and will most likely have their tech. in products in the future.

-edig shares outstanding about half of ptsc, and they (edig) does not have confusion about who owns what.

-edig has in the past worked with some very well know companies, so when edig does do something significant, edig will be noticed "BIG TIME".

-edig I believe does not have all the complexity that ptsc has in regards to warrants, etc. I hope this correct, although I'm not sure how all the loans in the past have structured.

-lastly I hope it is easier for edig patents infringement to be indentified (due to the co's that edig has worked with in the past) and without the court process once established. And if the legal teams of ptsc are involved with edig, they would know more about accelerating the handling of edig patents infringement from their previous experiences.

I hope some of my assumption are valid, but would love to see a continued dialog. I am still considering investing more money so I can lower my price point to sell one day.

BTW , I own edig and ptsc as many here do. Plus I appreciate all the heads up from those in PLRS, CKYS and XKEM.

Merry Christmas

Tom