"Having the ability does not equate to having the will when it comes to the steps necessary to identify, prepare, and finally to prove such 'granularity' in court. "

The collective action of each 'granularity' culminate at the cache....This element is somewhat outer surface discernible.

Do you under stand that?

The big reason for a company to infringe would be to remove the power burden of refresh circuitry for RAM resource....cutting it down to the smallest size and then being able to specialize circuit sleep that resource...e.Digital(MOS) variably sizes the cache depending on the hardware makeup(256 byte formally referenced ) at one read/write block size..along with that, it manages  independent of the erase block.....Do you under stand how important it is to be erase block independent with regard to RAM resource? This is a significant collective process culminating at the cache.

If anyone is infringing the idea,  it is discernible....IMO this is all you would need to prove with out going too much further....if you need to delve into the inner  'granularity' then that's what will have to happen.

They can initiate at this point....or start the process of bargain or poker.....any way you want to look at it....This could be the hint of a broad strategy.

IMO...they can attempt to flush um out right there.

doni