"Seriously, my sole purpose in addressing this area is the well-being of the shareholder."

I think it's rather condescending to imply shareholders didn't understand that EDIG was and remains a highly speculative investment whether it's 1999 or 2007.  By definition, all otcbbs are just that, speculation.

I also think everyone understands the market potential to some degree and what that could mean to a company the size of EDIG.

I fail to see how posting a real time uptick or volume spike or trading surge hurts or confuses anyone.

My point is most investors are here in anticipation of seeing EDIG's potential achieved.  Seven years later that potential remains intact, albeit by a back door manuever.  While EDIG was not successful in leveraging the market with its own specific product lines, several other companies with similar visions were, to the tune of BILLIONS of dollars revenues along with great stock price appreciation...same vision, differerent result.

Now EDIG seeks to reclaim its vision via its patent portfolio. 

Somehow you posting down ticks and wringing hands with warnings of over jubilence doesn't aid the well being of any shareholder, imo. We've had seven years to understand that the reward was followed by risk.

We have the classic hacks picking apart a penny stock's financials ad nauseum, as if anyone here bought EDIG for its financials.  The reality is EDIG is still HERE, with PATENTS and moving forward on leveraging over 174 companies and 1372 products that have been in the marketplace for over a decade.

That's where investor focus should be as opposed to your self imposed moderating of where the middle ground is. I know your intentions are well motivated but your efforts are counterproductive, imo.

The fact that concurrently EDIG is building a business plan around a relatively new product line (eVU), one which could help sustain other operations, bodes well for investor comfort but the flash markets could provide EDIG with the big boost we seek.

That's why I'm here, you're here and most others, imo.

Investor and market perception will dictate price movement, not you or me, and again, I fail to see how posting down ticks as a justification for your self appointed position of "shareholder protector" helps to accomplish your goal.

If anything, the discussions obsessing over investor excitement detracts from what an exciting time may be upon us.  Monitizing the value of the first list of infringers will give us a better idea of what we actually are holding. Shareholders have been calling for such tactics from management for years. 

The time appears to be upon us.

Maybe we could get back to discussing where this quarter is headed and what that means to each and every one of our bottom lines with regard to this investment.

There are plenty bashers who prefer to see negative discourse with the focus OFF of EDIG's patent potential.  I say refocus on where this might be headed with the caveat that the downside is clear.

Should EDIG surge to $24+ again, who are you going to protect then, those investors who staked claims in the pennies or those looking to make a play on the way to the top? There is no bad guy here, just risks and rewards and differing strategies.

Pardon me for still being excited at the prospects of the underdog fledgling beating the odds based on their patents and products.

The early on envisioned markets have proven themselves to be everything we imagined and more.

The ball is in EDIG's court, Pat Nunally is point guard and the bench support is stacked with legal teams sitting on patents.