For someone who writes prolix essays on "legal issues", and whose opinions are taken as gospal by many on such matters, I am surprised at your laxity for not being more detailed in your explanation of what avenues are available to WENCOR henceforth.

Your statement that follows does not comport with the facts of this case and has the effect of scaring current and potential investors in thinking that there is open ended potential for "ABUSE OF PROCESS" avaiable to wencor to cause continued grief to EDIG?...

"I think the merits are entirely on the side of e.Digital, but if someone wants to cause grief via spurious litigation they can certainly do so."

Since Judge Stewart alreasdy denied WENCOR's claim that they had any lock on the IP and the only issue to be litigated between the parties is possible damages relating to any alleged violation of the NDA agreement.

Pray tell  how can WENCOR continue with their causing grief for EDIG as you state, "Wencor can, however, IMO, cause delay in selling and receiving orders by creating doubt and obfuscation in the IFE market re e.Digital's ownership rights.".

And why wouldn't the above conduct be subject to injunctive relief and Sanction, considering the ruling of Federal Court in Utah?

Thanks in advance...

Gil...