The SANDISK case should be read by every EDIG shareholder. It highlights the importance of EDIG retaining DM as their attorneys...

The decision in SanDisk is 26 pages. However, its essence is outlined in the last 4 pages which comprise the concurring opinion of Justice Bryson...

As Justice Bryson conclues:...

"...I see no practical stopping point short of allowing declartory judgement actions in virtually any case in which the recipient of an invitation to take a patent license elects to dispute the need for a license and then to sue the patentee."

Here lies the key to DM having the vast experte in litigating such case at all levels and forums...

They will make sure, (just like Nanully ahs done), that all the ducks are in order, and then make their offers of settlement along with a "Put up or shut up" letter as the 9th circuit puts it..