Boyer affidavit......

What did they call the video/audio platform?......... MicroCam 

   =======================================================================

Boyer affidavit......RE: April 2002 agreement

        32.

You did agree in writing ....by signing the new October 2002 agreement with  Non-disclosure clause. By the way Your April 2002 agreement was not a Non- compete agreement,  it was a Non Disclosure agreement with a clause of non compete.

You agreed  to new terms with a fixed time frame of 3 years in Oct 2002 agreement.  

Bill, can you read the new terms of,  free and un restricted access,  for the

new Oct 2002 Non disclosure clause?

This is where you gave e.Digital the right,  while establishing a hard time frame that did not exist prior. 

A business interest was evaluated  with regard  to the April 2002  "Non disclosure agreement " by e.Digital. 

You and e.Digital then took it to the next stage.

You also agreed to the following clause,  by signing the new Oct. 2002  agreement . It was right in front of you  as you signed off.  If it was your thought the April 2002 agreement was still in effect,  why would you jeopardize it by signing off on the conditions of the following clause  in the new agreement?  Other than the April 2002 agreement,  what would it supersede?  

If you had true concern, you would not have allowed it,  I know I wouldn't have allowed it.

As a share holder of e.Digital Bill,  I say you sold them out.  Have you sold off your e.Digital Stock?

If you have, it would be interesting to see the date of that transaction.

========================================================================

Boyer affidavit......RE: April agreement

It's not a Non-compete Agreement....read the heading of your Apr 2002 agreement Bill...

As for a time frame on April 2002 agreement, there wasn't one. With what you state, .e.Digital,   or you,  for that matter,  could have walked away the day after you signed it.  Had e.Digital  walked away the next day, your  Non compete clause would have protected you for 7 years,  giving  you a time frame to eventually line some one up .  e.Digital did not walk away.  After their allowed  evaluation period , they agreed to work with you on the project. 

 Once you lined a vendor up,  you were not as concerned with the 7 year time frame. You cleared the initial obstacle and moved on to a new agreement with new clause conditions.  

That is why you signed the new Oct 2002 agreement and allowed the..... 

"Q. Entire Agreement" clause, 

Boyer affidavit......RE: April agreement

Then why did you sign the Oct 2002 agreement allowing a condition of default for e.Digital  to have an unrestricted access ?  See "Term and Termination" of the Oct 2002 Agreement you signed.

===========================================================================

August 20, 2004

APS SIGNS EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING ALLIANCE WITH WENCOR

Boyer affidavit:

Brent Wood affidavit:

Looks like Bill hooked him right out of the gates....Aug 20, 2004 to Oct ?..... closed the deal in less than 60 days. 

Oct 2002 agreement

Is APS/DigEcor in default?  Looks to me that DigEcor tried to push e.Digital into default with their trip to Maycom.

Along with that, as far as we know,  there's  an  eVu missing that was

 sent to DigEcor via  Alitalia Air.   RE: Mohammet affidavit.