Re: Clark Dec
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 07, 2007 01:21PM
From paragraph 17 of the Ferguson dec,
17. The NDA's language made it explicit that Boyer's idea had a "patent pending". This language convinced me to sign the NDA with the non-compete language as I was assured that Boyer had a valuable product idea that was unique and already developed to the point of filing a patent application.
Paragraph 2 of the 2002 NDA clearly shows the phrase "Patent Pending" relating to Boyer's "confidential information". Truth is Boyer never intended to file a patent since he had no device to patent at that time. Like Ferguson said, Boyer's confidential information wasn't unique at all.