"The fact that it is EDIG who put up its IP to facilitate the production and sale of the eVU implies that it is "them" who assume the responsibility for "taking it on the Chin" and not the manufacturers..."

My premise is based on the clause presented in the SEC filings relating to manufacturer.

It states..... keeping in mind unfilled purchase orders=manufacturer

At June 30, 2007 the Company had outstanding unfilled purchase orders and was committed to a contract manufacturers and component suppliers for approximately $1.9 million of future deliveries. Purchase commitments for product and components are generally subject to modifications as to timing, quantities and scheduling and in certain instances may be cancelable without penalty.

What is this concession for ? Why is it mentioned?

 IMO...its for trials where the 750k goes back to lender.

 Has e.Digital partnered with a company willing to share risk?

doni