Reading some articles on infringement cases makes the case for making a company's infringement claim "understandable" to a jury, as opposed to arguing the technicalities.(although you have to have that argument on board for obvious reasons)

I would think that most juries have a good handle on the handheld markets and understand what flash is....and considering the patent portfolio and EDIG's early position in designing, manufacturing and selling products, not to mention having laid claim to the first portable flash based device, it wouldn't take a lot of convincing that EDIG beat everyone to the game but got muscled out by bigger fish.

Would you risk a multi-billiion market or judgement by a jury of 12 or would you settle?

Dragging EDIG through the mud might be a strategy but with DM armed with patents and working on a contingency basis one would have to think settlements will be the order of the day.

You really have to like EDIG's chances....the Woody patents have a track record and are well documented....this isn't a scribble on a napkin at Denny's.