Well I sure didn't think there was anything due on this case today but after checking PACER, I see there was a hearing today. After hearing arguments, looks like the Court will rule ASAP on whether CA or WA law applies in the case. Will monitor for results.
Doc. No. | Dates | Description |
127 |
Filed & Entered: |
10/09/2007 |
| Motion Hearing |
Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart : Motion Hearing held on 10/9/2007 re [112] MOTION to Strike [99] Declaration, [100] Declaration, [98] Declaration, [97] Declaration, and Portions of e.Digital's Response to digEcor's Statement of Facts MOTION to Strike [99] Declaration, [100] Declaration, [98] Declaration, [97] Declaration, and Portions of e.Digital's Response to digEcor's Statement of Facts filed by Digecor, [69] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Digecor. The Court asks for argument on whether CA or WA state law should apply in this case. Plaintiff's counsel David Tufts argues for WA law, defendants argue for CA law. The other motions scheduled for today's hearing are submitted on the briefs. Court takes the matter of state law under advisement and will issue a ruling as soon as possible. Attorney for Plaintiff: Erin Middleton, David Tufts, Attorney for Defendant Samuel Straight, Ryan Bell. Court Reporter: Patti Walker. (slm) |
126 |
Filed & Entered: |
08/24/2007 |
| Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion |
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [112] MOTION to Strike [99] Declaration, [100] Declaration, [98] Declaration, [97] Declaration, and Portions of e.Digital's Response to digEcor's Statement of Facts MOTION to Strike [99] Declaration, [100] Declaration, [98] Declaration, [97] Declaration, and Portions of e.Digital's Response to digEcor's Statement of Facts filed by Counter Defendant Digecor, Plaintiff Digecor. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit Exhibit B)(Middleton, Erin) |
-- |
Filed & Entered: |
08/17/2007 |
| Motions No Longer Referred |
Docket Text: Motions No Longer Referred: [124] Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Reply Memorandum to digEcor's Motion to Strike Portions of the Declarations of Fred Falk, Stephen Ferguson, William Blakely, Ken Clark, and e.Digital's Statement of Facts (asb) |
125 |
Filed & Entered: |
08/17/2007 |
| Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Docket Text: ORDER granting [124] Motion for Extension of Time to file reply memorandum re: Motion to Strike. Reply due by 8/24/07. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 8/17/07. (blk) |
124 |
Filed & Entered: |
08/16/2007 |
Terminated: |
08/17/2007 |
| Motion for Extension of Time |
Docket Text: Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Reply Memorandum to digEcor's Motion to Strike Portions of the Declarations of Fred Falk, Stephen Ferguson, William Blakely, Ken Clark, and e.Digital's Statement of Facts filed by Counter Defendant Digecor, Plaintiff Digecor. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to David Nuffer.(Middleton, Erin) |
123 |
Filed & Entered: |
08/07/2007 |
| Scheduling Order |
Docket Text: SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference vacated.Discovery due by 6/27/2008.,Motions due by 7/18/2008., Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/15/2008 02:30 PM before Judge Ted Stewart.,8 day Bench Trial set for 1/5/2009 08:30 AM before Judge Ted Stewart. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 08/06/2007. (asp) |