I'd love to be privy to some of those DM sessions with Pat Nunally.

Considering this:

"Currently, when a small component of a large and successful product is found infringing, the damages that are assessed may be based not on the value of the infringing component, but on the value of the product as a whole." 

DM has to be taking its time to make sure everything is in order as they have already, TO DATE, identified an ANNUAL $20 Billion revenue base that they feel infringed.  damages based of the value of the product as a whole makes a very serious threat.

Billion with a "B".  And that's just one year.

And Vivitar is not a billion dollar infringer.

So who gets named next?