Perhaps you didn't read my post carefully. I even copied a portion of the 8-K in my post. The surprise comment relates to the late announcement, the Jan 8-K.

I noted the 8-K and questioned why we had to wait until early January for a new 8-K when the transactionm must have been in place in mid-December as the note due date states.

"That's because many of us read the SEC filings, it's detailed in their 8-K filing dated October 15, 2007.

The surprise was that they didn't meet their obligation and we didn't hear anything until they filed the January 4 2008 8-K."

A portion of the 8-K folows: