Re: PACER
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 22, 2008 04:21AM
The issue is the production of documents being given to digEcor from eDigital.
From the Pacer .pdf; my fav and it just seems like digEcor is getting more and more lame......
Rather than concede that its motion is moot, digEcor dismisses the tens of thousands of pages already produced by claiming that it has not yet been able to review them due to technical issues.