Re: Markman - psyop
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 12, 2008 01:12PM
wolfy
Thanks for so eloquently responding to my post however I dont see the correlation between shorty aka shortshypedstocks and lawyerlong. Shorty bashed the stock to no end and never claimed to be a long.LL claims to be a long and yet post a negative comment on anypositive announcement or event regarding edig. My feet our firmly planted on the ground and the share price is my only measure . Perhaps you can go back and read my most recent post as to the reason Y i am not a fan of LL. Specifically he chastized me on this board for making a comment regarding downstream infringers . Meaning ,using intc as an example only, If intc infringed on an edig patent and sold that technology ( that was infringing on an edig patent) and the companies that bought that tech also profited then all of those companies would be liable and would have to make edig whole. LL chastized that thought and not a month later out came the article regarding triple damages which in my mind confirmed my opinion. If you would also like to join the sheep that kiss LLs arse you are welcome to join them. I for one will kiss no ones arse and will post what i feel when I feel it. If anyone doesnt like it then its tuff poopoo. Perhaps you view his posts in a different light however to me he is very negative . He has also had run ins with several on the board . In any case I am here because I still believe that something great can come out of our edig investment :-)