Thanks S.S. Ya, I think the judge is listening for the end of arguments to make sure, it is, what it is. Then I think it's safe to assume after this guys testimony that EDIG had "NO" involvement with these negociations and subsequent deal. It would be mindboggling to believe as Putnam has said to me before that EDIG would "in there WILDEST DREAMS" sell their IP for pennies (25k) when they have made it clear that they would NEVER even give "Any" company an exclusive on their tech, let alone for peanuts. Quite, the active posting I see over the weekend. Can't wait to chime in and respond to a couple of Yeah hoos when I get a minute. Yes, you know who you are, especially if you're a "negative spinster " and you go by the intials, Lawyerlong. Geez, a call from Manilla! Ya, and I've got some "beachfront" property to sell you, just as soon as I get done having martini's with Bon jovi. And this "isn't" a spelling B or grammar school, so save it, it's your only defense. Looking for an exciting week, and cheaper shares thanks to the biggest thieves (ex-thieves) in the market, Bear Stearns. The Kings of orchestrating the "Naked short sell." Couldn't happen to a bigger group of scumbags, and for what it's worth, I think there down fall is being covered up. I wouldn't doubt their troubles to be related to "naked short selling" but we might never know? Who's next? mguru