Pretty cool. In Doc 214, EDIG is asking the Court to rule that they did not breach any non-compete provision of the 2002 NDA as digEcor has claimed. They cite several good reasons as support for their argument. EDIG is also asking the Court to rule in their favor regarding digEcor's claims about the DRM Agreement, unfair competition and non-delivery of a specification document.

If EDIG is successful in convincing the Court we did not breach a non-compete provision, this case will be over very soon.