.No matter what way it is labled, the important issue for consideration is that DM is on the Ball, and has not caved in to the Court's "Suggestion" of 10...

So long as there is no ORDER by the Court that the limit shall be 10, any increase in the number of ways the defendants are infringing our Patents means that much more in "Damages" to be awarded to EDIG..

Thus, increasing the number to 18 from the "Suggested" 10 means DM is trying to increase our "TAKE" by 1.8 times...

Gil