The brilliance of MOS lies in the fact that it elegantly handles it`s tasks without consuming much power. By elegantly I mean that it is done with a minimum of code. There are many ``work-arounds`` , but with many more thousand lines of code needed to accomplish what MOS does elegantly. To process all those lines of code in the ``work-arounds`` requires many more cycles that eat up battery power. Thus Roberts statement to Trillium.

With inseat power provided by the airplane, MOS`s low power attractiveness isn`t necessary, and they have gone to a very robust Linux as the chief operating system. Edig had been advertising for Linux programmers well over a year ago, so this makes sense.

What doesn`t make sense is that RP resorts to such weasel wording when he performs his task of investor relations. In all companys I ever worked for that job required that person to give as much info as could be shared to promote the stock price. He seems to have been so burned by previos missteps that now he gives next to nothing. I for one think he should reexamine his position and give us loyal longs more than he is presently putting out.

OFarmer