Okay, now you`re confusing me! First, yes MOS, then no MOS, now yes MOS - but after I proposed an explanation for NO MOS IN ITS ENTIRETY, but only elements thereof. Doni seems to agree with me.... I hoped this would bring an end to this. Can we simply agree that either MOS or elements thereof are indeed incorporated in the digEsystem? (and let it go at that?).

As far as margins, I doubt there would much change from that for portables. EDIG IP would still need to be licensed, and EDIG would most likely continue as overseer of production (since they are technically equipped to do so). So maybe they`re licensing 3 patents instead of 4 for the digEsystem. Would that be cause to change margins significantly? And what if more EDIG tech were applied? Plus the technical complexity of this system may warrant/justify a higher margin. So margins IMO could be a little higher or lower; but if there is a big difference, I suspect it would be toward the higher side (due to a greatly more complex device/system). JMHO

And I KNOW nuttin`!

SGE