...I don't think I smell the water treatment plant anymore....

X Document & Exhibits are CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY: FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

no need to mention cross-license since Digecor has nothing EDIG needs, and in the event cross-license was mentioned, then that would indicate that they did have some sort of rights to technology.

Keeping the name out of the settlement was to save face...

Settling before an infringement suit from DM was filed saves a lot of money defending the next assumed suit.... even Digecor can read that writing on the wall with the odds of win / loss on the patent infringement.

"Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition To Digecor’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Counterclaims for Defamation and Tortious Interference "

Edigital says we no longer object to the MSJ (we no longer want the MSJ as we have reached an agreement on a major part of the case, and are finalizing the rest of the details... but we need to keep this confidential to being seen on PACER so Digecor's defendant can save face) ...

hmmm...

but I could be wroong just engaging in speculation with absolutely no idea of what the real facts are here.