Now I am confused.......You reference a post and copied it into your message and then showed the response by another individual..

These two posts you presented didn't have anything to do with LL

Help straighten me out.

"read this post from Pravda and see if it may have a double purpose and then read Sky's response which isn't at all unreasonable. Sky even provides the link to the relevant info.

Here's the original post by Pravda:

"Will EDIG's patents expired before 10 years? If so, forget about subsequent licensing agreements. All we can snag are $'s for past sins. That will take a lot more work than what DM is doing at the moment. I would expect less income.....assuming DM or any other firm even takes those cases."

Sky's post:

It's easier to find the answer to this sort of thing than it is to ask the question........

http://edigital.com/flashr.htm

Which of the posts do you find to be more constructive?

Which of the posts do you find more balanced and constructive?