Free
Message: Re: 1st 90 days of 2009 - 98
1
Jan 26, 2009 07:13AM
2
Jan 26, 2009 07:24AM

Jan 26, 2009 07:30AM
8
Jan 26, 2009 09:05AM
8
Jan 26, 2009 02:03PM
1
Jan 26, 2009 03:55PM
3
Jan 26, 2009 07:33PM
1
Jan 27, 2009 02:40AM

Jan 27, 2009 05:13AM
10
Jan 27, 2009 06:49AM
3
Jan 27, 2009 07:52AM
9
Jan 27, 2009 08:21AM
2
Jan 27, 2009 08:31AM

Jan 27, 2009 08:34AM
2
Jan 27, 2009 08:41AM

Jan 27, 2009 09:07AM
2
Jan 27, 2009 09:35AM
2
Jan 27, 2009 09:52AM

a discount is a reduction from the amount that is owed for example we figured LG owes us $2.1 mil a determind number (based on units sold times a %) so we told them if you pay now we will offer you a discount of $.5 mil so they paid $1.6 mil.

No problem with your example, but since we lack details... I view a discount as nothing more than an inducement to settle.

If we ask Casio for $3 mil but they offered $2 mil and we accepted this is not a discount it is an offer and acceptance.

No problem with that either... which might help make my point. While the concept of a discount may be meaningful, the specifics of it aren’t really measurable (at least by us). In that regard, we shouldn’t assume that no discount will necessarily mean more dollars.

Expectations for the first settlement were way out of line. I think most now have more realistic expectations going forward. Either way, it will be EXTREMELY interesting to see each new set of numbers.

- Sinkman

1
Jan 27, 2009 12:09PM
1
Jan 27, 2009 12:13PM
3
Jan 27, 2009 12:23PM

Jan 27, 2009 12:35PM
1
Jan 27, 2009 12:57PM

Jan 27, 2009 02:14PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply