From what I can tell it's this negative slant "not" necessarily the information contained in his posts that members seem to react the most to.

Ummm, so how does one offer an alternative interpretation to a scenario without sounding negative to the one offering or accepting the original interpretation? It IS the information these members you refer to are offended by. The slant is inherent in the information. I see the value in the information LL offers, some others do not.

Wolfy