You crack me up....I did not, or do not think they will only have 8 per year. This concept has been misunderstood before...so I must not be clear on this.

The 25 year time frame was only to demonstrate how VAST an untapped money source 180+ infringers actually represents.

Sometimes I think that we do not realize how big of a deal that is. Most companies sue one or two infringers and it's a big deal.

I think that logistically DM will have its hands full. I wonder if they will have to sub-contract some of this out to other firms to get this done in just "SEVERAL" years....which was management's projection.

This is all VERY GOOD stuff. I too am convinced they will have to RAMP it up.