is that they are one of seven in the same suit. As mentioned by some here that RP stated something of the nature of "low hanging fruit" which has been discussed the meaning being, "easily proven infringement".

Easily proven infringement, does this apply to all seven infringers? I believe so! Samsung more so than the others simply because of the exposure to edig's IP.

Whether DM strategy or not to go to Markman, does not matter, because most likely Samsung was the heavy hitter of the 7. Samsung should owe edig the most.

DM/edig is on the right track, I just hope DM has a new group of infringers that they are going after whether by notification of legal avenue.

glta

Tom