Re: PACER digEcor - Rulings on Partial Summary Judgments
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 13, 2009 08:17PM
Still reading but found one win for EDIG, and it's a big one.
For the reasons below, the court rules that California law applies to the 2002 NDA.
Further, the court holds that Paragraphs 1, 4, 5 and 6 of 2002 NDA are invalid under California law because they refrain e.Digital from lawfully competing with digEcor. Summary judgment against digEcor and in favor of e.Digital on their claims regarding those provisions of the 2002 NDA is therefore appropriate.