Free
Message: Re: PACER digEcor - Rulings on Partial Summary Judgments

Still reading but found one win for EDIG, and it's a big one.



For the reasons below, the court rules that California law applies to the 2002 NDA.
Further, the court holds that Paragraphs 1, 4, 5 and 6 of 2002 NDA are invalid under California law because they refrain e.Digital from lawfully competing with digEcor. Summary judgment against digEcor and in favor of e.Digital on their claims regarding those provisions of the 2002 NDA is therefore appropriate.

13
Mar 13, 2009 09:20PM
1
dlj
Mar 14, 2009 05:44AM

Mar 14, 2009 10:42AM

Mar 14, 2009 02:30PM

Mar 14, 2009 02:32PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:54PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:56PM
12
Mar 14, 2009 04:34PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:48PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:52PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 05:38PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:39PM
10
Mar 15, 2009 07:23AM
3
Mar 15, 2009 07:39AM
2
Mar 15, 2009 07:59AM
5
May 26, 2009 01:30PM
3
May 26, 2009 02:33PM
3
May 26, 2009 05:53PM
6
May 26, 2009 06:15PM
4
May 27, 2009 06:28AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply