Another mistake by BOW and his henchmen...

FIRST:...

The following pargraph clearly mistates the judge's Ruling...

The Judge did not say he would not enforce a non-compete agreement because of "technicality"... He jsaid the California law applied to the case and said Law declares non-competition agreements such as the one in this case were VOID...

SECOND:...

Big mistake to tell a judge, with whom you still have business, that he made a ruling based on "Technicality", and that your are going to appeal it. Now he is really going to throw Technicalities at them...Lol...Lol...

Gil...

By invoking a technicality, the trial judge said he would not enforce a non-compete agreement under provisions of California law even though e.Digital had signed a contract and promised not to engage in competition. While digEcor will have to wait to appeal the court's decision that "Paragraphs 1, 4, 5 and 6 of the 2002 NDA are invalid under California law,"