"His original post is below. In it he attempts to say they are only barred from claims against Samsung re the two patents in THIS LAW SUIT. He also says the door is NOT CLOSED on filing other claims based on those two patents against Samsung in the future."

==============================

Not to be redundant but....

item 1 "And since DM agreed this disnmissal is to be WITH PRERJUDICE, they cannot raise the same claims made/or could have been made in THIS LAW SUIT in the future..."

in the same post he commented

item(2) Samsung lawyers agreed to dismiss all declaratory judgement counter claims by Samsung of NON-INFRINGEMENT relating to 445 and 108 patenets that are brought IN THIS LAW SUIT WITH PREJUDICE...This could only mean that no such claims can be raised by SAMSUNG in the future, as they just agreed that NON-INFRINGMENT CLAIMS ARE BANNED, NOW AND FOR THE FUTURE

Your contention is he made a mistake in item 1.....that I did question...

However, reviewing the complete context of item one and two.... his intent meaning of future is apparent.

That's how I see it, as expressed between the two items.

doni