Free
Message: Re: Larry/PACER Samsung - jefother
12
Apr 03, 2009 08:55AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:00AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 09:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:06AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:07AM
6
Apr 03, 2009 09:17AM
8
Apr 03, 2009 09:22AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:26AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:31AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:33AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:35AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:39AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:40AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 10:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 11:35AM

Apr 03, 2009 11:53AM
2
Apr 03, 2009 12:23PM
7
Apr 03, 2009 02:13PM
3
Apr 03, 2009 02:32PM
2
Moo
Apr 03, 2009 02:36PM
13
Apr 03, 2009 06:42PM
4
Apr 03, 2009 08:11PM
6
Apr 03, 2009 08:25PM
2
Apr 03, 2009 11:52PM
25
Apr 04, 2009 06:16AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:32AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 06:35AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:48AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:11AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:17AM
20
Apr 04, 2009 07:22AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:33AM
6
Apr 04, 2009 07:36AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 07:39AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:46AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 07:50AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:03AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:05AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:10AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:11AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:30AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:40AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:00AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:05AM

Apr 04, 2009 09:06AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:10AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:24AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:26AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:29AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:32AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:12AM
9
Apr 04, 2009 11:17AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:38AM
5
Apr 04, 2009 11:42AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:49PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:55PM
1
Apr 04, 2009 02:56PM
13
Apr 04, 2009 03:22PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 03:23PM
4
Apr 04, 2009 03:42PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:05PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:23PM

Re: Larry/PACER Samsung - jefother

posted on Apr 04, 2009 04:36PM

"Could Samsung be aligning with EDIG as you suggest? Quite possibly."


again, (for those who missed it yesterday) this would allow the door to be kept 'open' for the future:


THIRD:

(3) Samsung lawyers also agreed to dismiss al their claims of INVALIDITY relating to 445 and 108 WITHOUT PREJUDICE, which means they can raise them in the future.


IF they are considering a buyout, they want these patents intact (I'd venture to say that would be true with any entity looking to tender an offer on EDIG). Assuming that the DD determines a buyout is not a good use of Sammy's cash, then they have the opportunity to bring up the claim again.



Quite possibly, the number crunchers are looking very seriously at the patents and doing the DD needed to determine if Sammy wants to be the company that 'controls' FLASH, and what the true value of that is.




Or perhaps DM was just being overly broad and wanted to cover all options.




2
Apr 04, 2009 05:46PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 05:53PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:49PM

Apr 04, 2009 07:57PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:30PM
5
Apr 05, 2009 05:01AM
2
Apr 06, 2009 03:30AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply