Don't get confused by what you read here my friend!...

FIRST:...

There are ethical rules in most States that govern filing of frivolous law suits by lawyers just to charge their hourly rates...

SECOND:...

Practicing trail Lawyers, ( English call them Barristers, as opposed to Scrivners who are labled "paper pushers" in U.S.), know full well that they have to appear before the Court again, and also know that Courts do not relish what is done by a lawyer, ( like the Digecor lawyers), in the past...

THIRD:...

Most Jurisdiction now have some sort of ANTI SLAPP LAWS, and if you read the following excerpt, you will see that California has one of the strongest in the Nation. Also, you know that the Judge has already RULED that California Law governs this case. Thus, the motions filed by EDIG Lawyers may just be a prelude to a Motion to dismiss Bow out of Court if he continues with his redundent "Law suits"...

Gil...

Here is the ANTI SLAPP piece.

"SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) are basically when a large corporation just files suit against someone knowing that the lawsuit alone will cause them problems, no matter how bogus the lawsuit is. Many states have created anti-SLAPP laws that let victims of SLAPP suits ask for them to be quickly dismissed. California has good anti-SLAPP laws, but they may get even stronger. While current California law lets those accused in SLAPP lawsuits to also get back attorneys fees, the law may now be extended to cover lawsuits filed outside of California against California residents. This should serve to help protect anonymity online as well as the ability to speak out against much larger entities. Hopefully, other states will follow suit as well."...

And that is my posting quota for the day...