Free
Message: PACER digEcor 335 Text

PACER digEcor 335 Text

posted on Apr 15, 2009 06:19PM

Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Stipulated Motion for Revised Scheduling order submitted by the parties, digEcor, Inc. submits these objections to e.Digital’s Pre-Trial Disclosures Concerning e.Digital’s Affirmative Counterclaims—Defamation and Tortious Interference.


I. digEcor’s Objections to Witnesses e.Digital Expects to Call at Trial

1. digEcor objects to e.Digital’s designation of Fred Falk and William Blakeley to the extent e.Digital anticipates relying on Mr. Falk or Mr. Blakeley to present expert testimony. digEcor does not have any objections to Mr. Falk or Mr. Blakeley offering testimony as fact witnesses. Neither Mr. Falk nor Mr. Blakeley has been designated to give expert testimony on any subject.

2. digEcor objects to the designation of Scott Hampton to the extent he cannot satisfy the Daubert requirements or the requirements for expert witnesses under the Federal Rules of Evidence. digEcor’s objections will be detailed in its Daubert motions filed at the appropriate time under the Scheduling Order.

II. digEcor’s Objections to Witnesses that e.Digital May Call at the Trial

1. digEcor objects to the designation of Emanuela Camerlengo, Tullia Ialongo, Sabine Hierschbiel, and Sally Gethin on the grounds that these individuals were not identified in e.Digital’s Initial Disclosures.

2. digEcor objects to the designation of Kevin Bostenero to the extent e.Digital seeks to use Mr. Bostenero as an expert witness. Mr. Bostenero has not been designated to give expert testimony on any subject.

III. digEcor’s Objections to Witnesses Whose Testimony e.Digital Expects to Present by Deposition

1. digEcor objects to the use of the transcripts of digEcor’s 30(b)(6) deposition and e.Digital’s 30(b)(6) deposition on the grounds that e.Digital has not identified the specific portions of the transcripts it intends to present. digEcor therefore is unable to state its objections to e.Digital’s use of specific portions of these transcripts, and digEcor is unable to prepare


SLC_352255.1 2

rebuttal thereto under Rule 32 without knowing what portions of transcript testimony e.Digital intends to introduce.

2. digEcor objects to e.Digital’s use of any video of digEcor’s 30(b)(6) deposition on the grounds that e.Digital has not disclosed that it intends to rely on the video and because it has not disclosed which portions of the videos it intends to present at trial.

IV. digEcor’s Objections to Witnesses Whose Testimony e.Digital May Present by Deposition

1. digEcor objects to the use of the transcripts of the depositions of Web Barth, Chris Wood, Atul Anandpura, or any other witness on the grounds that e.Digital has not identified the specific portions of the transcripts it intends to present. digEcor therefore is unable to state its objections to e.Digital’s use of the specific portions of these transcripts. digEcor therefore is unable to state its objections to e.Digital’s use of specific portions of these transcripts, and digEcor is unable to prepare rebuttal thereto under Rule 32 without knowing what portions of transcript testimony e.Digital intends to introduce.

2. digEcor objects to e.Digital’s use of the video of any deposition it may introduce at trial on the grounds that e.Digital has not disclosed that it intends to rely on the video and because it has not disclosed which portions of the videos it intends to present at trial.

V. digEcor’s Objections to Exhibits that e.Digital Expects to Introduce at Trial

EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL EXPECTS TO INTRODUCE AT THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

OBJECTION

1. January 19, 2007 Memorandum Decision, Docket # 65.

2. October 12, 2007 Memorandum Decision, Docket # 129.


SLC_352255.1 3 EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL EXPECTS TO INTRODUCE AT OBJECTION THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

3. January 16, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Mauro Atturo, Attisano Carlo, Ialongo Tullia, ALIT000038.

hearsay, lack of foundation, authenticity

4. October 22, 2002 Agreement, Deposition Exhibit No. 27.

5. October 6, 2005 digEcor Press Release, TRIAD009451-56, DIGECOR094069.

hearsay, lack of foundation, authenticity

6. October 13, 2005 digEcor Press Release, DIGECOR094063-66.

hearsay, lack of foundation

7. March 28, 2006 Email: Ilona Ushinsky to Tracy Decuir, DECUIR11040.

hearsay, lack of foundation, authenticity

8. March 29, 2006 Email: Wencor to Neil Lynch, DIGECOR056042.

hearsay, lack of foundation

9. April 4, 2006 digEcor Press Release, DIGECOR166695.

hearsay, lack of foundation

10. February 2, 2007 Email Thread: Brent Wood and Sarah Fitzmaurice, DIGECOR001859-62.

hearsay, lack of foundation

11. February 12, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Tullia Ialongo, DIGECOR001874.

hearsay, lack of foundation

12. April 5, 2007 Email Thread: Brent Wood, Amir Hirani, Sally Gethin, DIGECOR001835-39.

hearsay, lack of foundation

13. May 1, 2007 Email thread: Brent Wood and Sally Gethin, DIGECOR001805-07.

hearsay, lack of foundation

14. May 6, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Dave Sampson, DIGECOR 001827.

hearsay

15. March 29, 2007 Email Thread: Brent Wood, Amir Hirani, Emanuela Camerlengo, Tullia Ialongo, Paola Magliuolo, DIGECOR001840.

hearsay, lack of foundation


SLC_352255.1 4 EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL EXPECTS TO INTRODUCE AT OBJECTION THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

16. May 25, 2007 Email: Amir Hirani to Brent Wood and Josh Lemon, DIGECOR001946.

hearsay, lack of foundation

17. May 31, 2007 Email: Frantz Yvelin, Chris Wood, Josh Lemon, DIGECOR001815-16.

hearsay, lack of foundation

18. May 31, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Frantz Yvelin, DIGECOR 001801.

hearsay, lack of foundation

19. November 28, 2007 Email Thread: Frantz Yvelin, Riad Mezoui, Fred Falk, William Blakeley, et. al., EDIGITAL046732-34.

hearsay, lack of foundation

20. January 21, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Tullia Ialongo, Mauro Atturo, Cado Attisano, DIGECOR001863-64.

hearsay, lack of foundation

21. January 23, 2007 Email: Tullia Ialongo

hearsay, lack of foundation

22. February 8, 2007 Email Thread: Brent Wood to Alitalia representatives, DIGECOR006891.

hearsay, lack of foundation

23. June 14, 2006 Letter: Rick Hoggard to David Tufts.

hearsay, lack of foundation, inadmissibility under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

24. July 6, 2006 Email: David Tufts to Rick Hoggard.

hearsay, lack of foundation, inadmissibility under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

25. February 9, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Philippe Monnier, DIGECOR001875.

hearsay

26. January 23, 2007 Email Thread: Andy Wilson, Dave Sampson, Brent Wood, Fred Falk, EDIGITAL033853-54.

hearsay, lack of foundation

27. May 2, 2007 Email: Brent Wood to Sabine Hierschbiel and Boris Krahl, DIGECOR001833-34.

hearsay, lack of foundation


SLC_352255.1 5 EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL EXPECTS TO INTRODUCE AT OBJECTION THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

28. Expert Report and supplementation of Scott Hampton.

Hearsay, lack of foundation, fails to satisfy the requirements of Daubert and Rule 702 and 703 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

VI. digEcor’s Objections to Exhibits that e.Digital may Introduce at Trial

EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL MAY INTRODUCE AT THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

OBJECTION

1. Docket Sheet, digEcor v. e.Digital, 2:06-CV-437.

2. E.Digital’s Second Set of Supplemental Responses to digEcor’s first Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production, Response to Interrogatory No. 14, Served April 17, 2008.

hearsay, lack of foundation, cumulative

3. August 16, 2006 Email: Brent Wood to Web Barth, DIGECOR055597.

hearsay

4. January 24, 2007 Email: Paola Magliuola, ALIT000040; EDIGITAL064719-20.

hearsay, lack of foundation, authenticity

5. e.Digital-Alitalia Contract, EDIGITAL009742-55; EDIGITAL035015-028

6. e.Digital-Mezzo Movies Contract, EDIGITAL009756-9784

7. e.Digital-Lufthansa Contract, EDIGITAL009785-9835.

8. e.Digital-Air France Contract, EDIGITAL009836-9846.

9. e.Digital-Malaysia Air Contract, EDIGITAL009847-9862; EDIGITAL038450-38466.


SLC_352255.1 6 EXHIBITS THAT E.DIGITAL MAY INTRODUCE AT THE OBJECTION TRIAL OF THIS MATTER ON THESE ISSUES

10. March 19, 2009 digEcor Press Release.

hearsay, lack of foundation

11. May 17, 2006 Email: Brent Wood to Amir Hirani, DIGECOR054741.

hearsay

12. August 18, 2006 Email: Brent Wood to Ben Pfisterer, DIGECOR054766

hearsay, lack of foundation

13. July 25, 2006 Email: Brent Wood to Damian Fannin, DIGECOR54888.

hearsay

14. June 5, 2006 Email Thread: Brent Wood and Sally Gethin, DIGECOR056470 et. seq.

hearsay, lack of foundation

15. May 8, 2007 Email: Volker Menges to Richard Hosey, DIGECOR065078-81.

hearsay, lack of foundation

16. November 15, 2006 Email: Brent Wood to Christian Maquin, DIGECOR001894.

hearsay

17. June 28, 2007 Email Thread: Amir Hirani and Brent Wood, DIGECOR001742-45.

hearsay, lack of foundation

18. eVU Overview Document, EDIGITAL043133, et. seq.

19. eVU Overview Document, EDIGITAL066591 et. seq.

DATED this 15th day of April, 2009.

DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR

/s/ Erin T. Middleton

David W. Tufts

Erin T. Middleton

Ian S. Davis

Attorneys for Plaintiff


SLC_352255.1 7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 15th day of April, 2009, I caused a copy of DIGECOR’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ RULE 26(a)(3) PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURES CONCERNING DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE COUNTERCLAIMS—DEFAMATION AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE to be served upon the following via the court’s CM/ECF system:

Samuel C. Straight

Ryan B. Bell

Ray Quinney & Nebeker, P.C.

36 South State Street, Suite 1400

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111

/s/ Shantell Pitts-Seare


SLC_352255.1 8

1
Apr 15, 2009 06:35PM
1
Apr 15, 2009 07:19PM
2
Apr 16, 2009 11:26AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply