IMO there has to be something of mutual-benifit going on to allow these dismissals because the statement, ''has caused and will continue to cause EDIG irreparable harm.'' is so true if we give them free leeway with our IP in XT.
''Third Counterclaim (Injunction) from page 10:
1. digEcor’s improper use of EDIG’s confidential information has caused and will continue to cause EDIG irreparable harm.
STATUS: EDIG requested dismissal of this counterclaim in Doc 308 on 12/12/08. Court granted the dismissal in Doc 310.
-----------
Fourth Counterclaim (Violation of Utah Trade Secrets Act) from page 10:
1. Some or all of e.Digital’s confidential information that was used by digEcor or its agents in the digEplayer XT project, constituted trade secrets of e.Digital, which digEcor knew or had reason to know it had acquired under circumstances, including express agreements and notices of confidentiality, giving rise to a duty of confidentiality to maintain its secrecy or limits it use in connection with e.Digital’s design activities.
STATUS: EDIG requested dismissal of this counterclaim in Doc 308 on 12/12/08. Court granted the dismissal in Doc 310.''
e
