Free
Message: Re: FROM LAW 360 - 1Coyote
6
Apr 28, 2009 04:33AM
10
Apr 28, 2009 05:28AM
3
Apr 28, 2009 05:50AM
2
Apr 28, 2009 06:09AM
7
Apr 28, 2009 06:13AM
2
Apr 28, 2009 06:21AM
3
dlj
Apr 28, 2009 06:23AM
4
Apr 28, 2009 06:36AM
2
Apr 28, 2009 06:51AM
3
Apr 28, 2009 06:53AM

The IFE Enterprise DigEcor exibits....minisqual....there's nothing to go after, it would be nothing more than a case tried on "principle" as ronran noted.

The same for e.Digital, it exhibits minisqual IFE Enterprise, not enough to go after or measure. However, it is being pursued as if there is/was something substantial there. Where, it's noted the gains collected were substantial prior to DigEcor receiving their 1200 unit digEplayer order......I wounder if the judge actually looked at the gains in that time frame?......Because DigEcor did not look, had they, they wouldn't have gone that rout of engagement and mentioned the numbers they did of e.Digitals gains. e.Digitals financials are a matter of public record.

ronran, IMO, DigEcor vs. e.Digital is a case being tried on "principle"(ego) without any significant enterprise involved.

doni



11
Apr 28, 2009 07:17AM
11
Apr 28, 2009 07:43AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 08:48AM
13
Apr 28, 2009 08:52AM
19
Apr 28, 2009 09:31AM
4
Apr 28, 2009 10:18AM
8
Apr 28, 2009 10:40AM
3
Apr 28, 2009 10:47AM
5
Apr 28, 2009 11:03AM
6
Apr 28, 2009 11:10AM
4
Apr 28, 2009 11:20AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:22AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:22AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:25AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:27AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:29AM
3
Apr 28, 2009 11:29AM
1
Apr 28, 2009 11:36AM
18
Apr 28, 2009 01:46PM
3
Apr 28, 2009 05:12PM
7
Apr 28, 2009 05:28PM
2
Apr 28, 2009 05:28PM
1
Apr 28, 2009 06:58PM
2
Apr 28, 2009 07:29PM

Apr 28, 2009 07:29PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply