"The agreement results in the dismissal of San Diego Federal Court Case No. 05 CV 1662 involving Broadcom's claims for infringement of the two now-dismissed Broadcom patents and eliminates the need for a trial that had been scheduled to begin on March 5, 2007. The agreement also includes the dismissal of infringement claims under two of Qualcomm's patents in Case No. 05 CV 1392, also pending in federal court in San Diego."

"Those patents had been divided among five separate jury trials scheduled to occur throughout 2007. The dismissal of the two Qualcomm patents and related claims and counterclaims will eliminate the need for one of those five trials."

They have agreed not to bother each other in the future with a two, for two trade off that shortened five separate trials.....for this, I can understand "with prejudice" all things equal.

What has Samsung given us in a trade off to agree to dismiss "with prejudice"?

doni