Well, Frank, you don`t know me from Adam, but I want to thank you for your efforts. I have been occasionally critical or cynical of your overly rosy reporting, but I don`t doubt you are telling what you think to be true. On this board, that counts for a lot.

When Putnam says

`EDIG WAS VERY CLOSE TO SIGNED CONTRACTS IN THOSE AREAS.``, (Of course a lot depends on how good your paraphrasing was)I have to say that sounds very much like ``We don`t have any contracts in those areas yet.`` It`s mid-2005, and we don`t have any contracts in those areas yet? Uh-oh!

Also ``THERE ARE MANY, MANY AREAS WE ARE INVOLVED RIGHT NOW THAT WILL PROVIDE US WITH MORE STABLE AND LUCRATIVE RETURNS.`` ... well, that won`t be too hard, will it? We`re not exactly raking it in from the Digeplayer now.

He said there would be many (what that means I do not know nor was I able to find out) news releases before and after when the 8 is filed at the end of June

Did he use the word `many`? That sounds like very good news to me. Now that I could get excited about. In reference to what Blunist said, I think it wouldn`t be out of line to insert an implied `good` in there.

Oh, but you know what I see now that I read your report again... maybe I`m going back too far to the cynical side, but Robert did not say the news releases would be from edig, did he? I mean, was that the clear implication, that edig would be releasing news?

Glad to hear about the tight parking and lots of bodies. Hopefully it`s not the result of unjustified expectations on the part of management.

Wolfy