*Why hasn't Management given shareholders updates on feedback regarding customer satisfaction of our IFE products out in the field... Where might we look to find it?

Upon completion of the DigEcor case there will be an update.

*Would a laptop be considered portable/handheld per our 774 patent for removable flash memory.

Our patents of removable media deal with recording devices, however, firmware interface to a PC might be challengable under 445 and 108...depending on how the resources of the laptop are utilized.

*Give one example of how an x-licensing deal might look.

We implement their tech utilizing our tech for future application.

*Is an eVU Kiosks a possibility to target the general population for leisure?

That would be considered an open system.

*Will the pending encryption patent utilize our current MicroOS patent/s as a foundation?

The development is proprietary.

*Is our MicroOS the primary reason the eVU battery is able to achieve such superior power retention. If so how? in layman’s terms

I refer you to the patents for explanations.

*Do the cross-licensing deals go beyond just the use of their IP in our eVU, i.e.,. benefit us on future platforms/devices using their patents/IP and cooperation?

They sell us, we hope to sell them.

*Could we elect to work with a company rather than sue them for our mutual benefit?

If they willingly license our tech.

*If we pursue 108-445 Tier 2 infringers will internal flash memory on pc's become involved?

Any platform is considered if we detect the use of flASH to be formatted and conjoined in hardware similarity.

*Since our TDL-data loader is Ethernet and eVU is a closed turn-key system; is our OS working with a higher OS which can be coupled to a partner’s wireless network or kiosks?

There is a PC interface to high level OS's that can be tailored, for that, our tech can be considered hardware independent and effortlessly portable.

just for giggles mind you...

doni