Yesterday was not my fist commentary regarding other memory types.

The only thing one need understand.....e.Digitals patents are based on a serialized process where normally you cannot obtain any real utility, they have complete utility.

The cheapest memory to produce is serial architecture.......no matter what the substrate makeup.

I've been commenting on this issue for a long time now, Daberko/Norris have devised their concepts to have complete utility.....implementing the least complex architecture of memory offerings.

While for the complex memory....they utilize them in the same manner....i.e NOR where they actually get a double duty out of the read.

e.Digital favors NAND because they know perfectly well it comes down to cost to produce the memory ....and they have key ingredients unlocking and allowing the versatility of it.

doni