You were a lawyer and you think case study is irrelevant?

Considering the growing emphasis on IP protection in today's market and at hand currently at EDIG, and the incredible results companies are receiving financially, I find looking at other cases and their results very relevant...especially flash memory cases.

You don't think EDIG investors should be aware that when successful, IP monetization efforts can yield settlements from $1 million to $600 million, expecially flash memory cases?

I find it quite informative that settlements occur much more often than jury verdicts and I find it interesting that some companies continue to willfully ignore the IP of others to further themselves. And I find the money exchanging hands incredibly relevant to anyone owning this stock since IP monetization is the company's key revenue generator.

Thankfully the system allows small companies trading at a dime some recourse.

And if you find that so irrelevant, why do you follow such reporting so closely on a daily basis?