I didn't change your original statement. I put in in my post. I then presented your logic/reasoning from a different perspective to show how the same logic you used could be shown to question some of your own posts. But let's ignore that.

I'm glad you think the company is good at communicating to shareholders. I, and others don't. One thing that has always annoyed me when emailing robert is his refusal to include my original email in his reply. He simply refuses to have my question and his direct answer in the same communication. Not sure why that is but doesn't provide a great comfort level.