Your opine as follows:...

"... there is, in my opinion, absolutely no chance of that happening. No matter how you do the math, 174 infringers to go or not, it would make no, I repeat NO financial sense for Samsung, even at $1 a share, to buy edig equaling a purchase price of over 300 million dollars for patents that expire in 5 years."...

Your premiss that EDIG is limited to 5 years to prosecute their claims of infringment is inaccurate...

Please tell us if you have researched the Statutory and Case Law upon which your opinion is based? Better yet, have you been reading the posts on this Board which had RP answering the very question and stating that there would be an additional 6 years extending the enforcebility of the patents to 11 years?...

As to your claim of being a champion of "Reality" in your admonishing us "...Speculation and wishful thinking are fun, but let's put down the kool aid and come back to reality.", excuse me if I take the words of one who knows the "Reality" , RP, far better than anyone on this Board...

GLTU...

Gil...